The Effectiveness of the Evidentiary Strength of Children’s Testimony as Victims of Violence in the Criminal Justice System
Abstract
This study aims to analyze the evidentiary strength of the statements of children in their position as witnesses to victims of violence, as well as the factors that influence the course of the trial. This research was conducted in Makassar City to be precise at the Makassar Police and Makassar District Court. Data collection techniques used in this study were interviews, documentation, and literature study. The data analysis technique used is qualitative data analysis techniques. The power of proof of testimony of children as victim witnesses is based on the evidentiary provisions in Law Number 8 of 1981. Children's statements cannot be used as evidence for valid witness testimony because they do not meet the formal requirements as evidence for witness testimony, because children are not sworn in so they are only used as evidence of clues based on the explanation in Article 171 of Law Number 8 of 1981. Therefore, evidence of clues cannot stand alone but must be supported by at least two other valid evidences. As for Article 171 of Law Number 8 of 1981 was apparently still defended in Bill Number 8 of 1981. It is better if these article must be reviewed so that the statements of child witnesses can become the main evidence, not only as evidence of clues.
Downloads
References
The 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. https://peraturan.go.id/id/uud-1945
Ahmad, M. J. (2011). Perlindungan Anak dalam Sistem Peradilan di Indonesia. DIH: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 7(13), 45-56. https://doi.org/10.30996/dih.v7i13.257
Begem, S. S., Qamar, N., & Baharuddin, H. (2019). Sistem Hukum Penyelesaian Pelanggaran Hak Asasi Manusia (HAM) Berat Melalui Mahkamah Pidana Internasional. SIGn Jurnal Hukum, 1(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.37276/sjh.v1i1.28
Biloro, S. (2018). Kekuatan Alat Bukti Keterangan Ahli dalam Pembuktian Perkara Pidana menurut KUHAP. Lex Crimen: Jurnal Elektronik Bagian Hukum Pidana, 7(1), 96-103. Retrieved from https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/v2/index.php/lexcrimen/article/view/19419
Chairilsyah, D. (2016). Metode dan Teknik Mengajarkan Kejujuran pada Anak Sejak Usia Dini. Jurnal Educhild: Pendidikan dan Sosial, 5(1), 8-14. Retrieved from https://educhild.ejournal.unri.ac.id/index.php/JPSBE/article/view/3822
Government Regulation in Lieu of Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 1 of 2016 on the Second Amendment to Law Number 23 of 2002 on Child Protection (State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia of 2016 Number 99, Supplement to the State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Number 5882). https://peraturan.go.id/id/perppu-no-1-tahun-2016
Harahap, M. Y. (2009). Pembahasan Permasalahan dan Penerapan KUHAP: Penyidikan dan Penuntutan. Sinar Grafika.
Hidayat, A. S., Anam, S., & Helmi, M. I. (2018). Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Anak sebagai Kurir Narkotika. Salam: Jurnal Sosial dan Budaya Syar-i, 5(3), 307-330. https://doi.org/10.15408/sjsbs.v5i3.10416
Kamal, M. (2019). Hubungan Pemerintahan Daerah dalam Mengelola Pendapatan Asli Daerah (PAD) Berdasarkan Undang-Undang 23 Tahun 2014. SIGn Jurnal Hukum, 1(1), 18-28. https://doi.org/10.37276/sjh.v1i1.32
Kholiq, M. A., & Wibowo, A. (2016). Penerapan Teori Tujuan Pemidanaan dalam Perkara Kekerasan terhadap Perempuan: Studi Putusan Hakim. Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum, 23(2), 186-205. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol23.iss2.art2
Kondoahi, A. V. (2014). Sanksi Pidana terhadap Anak yang Melakukan Pelanggaran Lalu Lintas. Lex et Societatis, 2(7), 34-45. Retrieved from https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/index.php/lexetsocietatis/article/view/5385
Krisna, L. A. (2015). Hasil Penelitian Kemasyarakatan sebagai Dasar Pertimbangan Hakim dalam Pengadilan Anak. Jurnal Hukum Samudra Keadilan, 10(1), 146-158.
Krisnamurti, H. (2016). Kedudukan Saksi Anak dalam Pembuktian Perkara Pidana. Wacana Paramarta: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 15(2), 1-11. Retrieved from http://paramarta.web.id/index.php/paramarta/article/view/28
Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 1 of 1946 on the Penal Code Regulations. https://jdih.dpr.go.id/setjen/detail-dokumen/tipe/uu/id/814
Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 1 of 1960 on Amendment of the Penal Code (State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia of 1960 Number 1, Supplement to the State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Number 1921). https://jdih.dpr.go.id/setjen/detail-dokumen/tipe/uu/id/1357
Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 8 of 1981 on the Code of Criminal Procedure (State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia of 1981 Number 76, Supplement to the State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Number 3209). https://jdih.dpr.go.id/setjen/detail-dokumen/tipe/uu/id/755
Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 23 of 2002 on Child Protection (State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia of 2002 Number 109, Supplement to the State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Number 4235). https://jdih.dpr.go.id/setjen/detail-dokumen/tipe/uu/id/322
Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 35 of 2014 on Amendment to Law Number 23 of 2002 on Child Protection (State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia of 2014 Number 297, Supplement to the State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Number 5606). https://jdih.dpr.go.id/setjen/detail-dokumen/tipe/uu/id/1617
Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 17 of 2016 on Enactment of Government Regulation in Lieu of Law Number 1 of 2016 on the Second Amendment to Law Number 23 of 2002 on Child Protection Into Law (State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia of 2016 Number 237, Supplement to the State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Number 5946). https://jdih.dpr.go.id/setjen/detail-dokumen/tipe/uu/id/1680
Mahmud, Y., Akili, R. H. S., Kadir, Y., & Moonti, R. M. (2019). Restorative Justice dalam Putusan Hakim Nomor: 31/Pid.Sus/2018/PN.Lbto Atas Kasus Persetubuhan terhadap Anak. SIGn Jurnal Hukum, 1(1), 52-69. https://doi.org/10.37276/sjh.v1i1.37
Mumtahanah, N. (2015). Upaya Menanggulangi Kenakalan Remaja secara Preventif, Represif, Kuratif dan Rehabilitasi. Al Hikmah: Jurnal Studi Keislaman, 5(2), 263-281. Retrieved from https://ejournal.kopertais4.or.id/pantura/index.php/alhikmah/article/view/2999
Qamar, N., & Rezah, F. S. (2020). Metode Penelitian Hukum: Doktrinal dan Non-Doktrinal. CV. Social Politic Genius (SIGn).
Sampara, S., & Husen, L. O. (2016). Metode Penelitian Hukum. Kretakupa Print.
Siregar, N. S. S. (2013). Persepsi Orang Tua terhadap Pentingnya Pendidikan bagi Anak. JPPUMA: Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan dan Sosial Politik UMA (Journal of Governance and Political Social UMA), 1(1), 11-27. Retrieved from https://ojs.uma.ac.id/index.php/jppuma/article/view/548
Suherman, A. (2019). Implementasi Independensi Hakim dalam Pelaksanaan Kekuasaan Kehakiman. SIGn Jurnal Hukum, 1(1), 42-51. https://doi.org/10.37276/sjh.v1i1.29
Tarigan, F. A. R. (2015). Upaya Diversi bagi Anak dalam Proses Peradilan Pidana. Lex Crimen: Jurnal Elektronik Bagian Hukum Pidana, 4(5), 104-112. Retrieved from https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/v2/index.php/lexcrimen/article/view/9013
Copyright (c) 2023 Rama Eka Darma

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.