The Role of the Supervision and Observation Judge on Guidance for Inmates

  • Bunyamin Muhammad Yafid Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam Darud Da’wah Wal-Irsyad
  • Abd. Kahar Muzakkir CV. Social Politic Genius (SIGn)

Abstract

Judicial institutions, as law enforcement agencies in the Criminal Justice System, are a foundation of hopes for justice seekers, as based on Article 2 section (4) of Law No. 48 of 2009, regulates that “the Court is done simply, quickly, and at a low cost”. Therefore, this study aims to determine the implementation of the Supervision and Observation Judge's role and the obstacles that affect the Supervision and Observation Judge's performance in implementing Court Decisions in the Penitentiary. This study uses two types of research, namely normative legal research and empirical legal research. This research was conducted at the Makassar Class I Penitentiary and the Makassar Class IA District Court. The types of data used in this study include primary data and secondary data. The data that has been collected is then processed descriptively qualitatively. The results of the study concluded that the implementation of the role of the Supervision and Observation Judge in the implementation of the decision of the Makassar Class IA District Court at the Makassar Class I Penitentiary has not run optimally, because between The Supervision and Observation Judge and the Head of the Penitentiary rarely meet and discuss guidance issues for Inmates at the Penitentiary. The obstacles in implementing the role of the Supervision and Observation Judge at the Penitentiary include the problem of insufficient funds available for operational supervision and observation and the absence of special staff to assist the Supervision and Observation Judge in recording their Inmates. Therefore, more specific implementing regulations are needed to certify that the judgment is being properly executed and under the laws and regulations in Indonesia. Furthermore, there is a need for effective cooperation between the Supervision and Observation Judge and the Penitentiary Officers, who must always coordinate as one unit in an integrated Criminal Justice System.

Keywords: Inmates, Judge, Penitentiary, Role, Supervision and Observation

Article Metrics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Bunyamin Muhammad Yafid, Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam Darud Da’wah Wal-Irsyad

Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam Darud Da’wah Wal-Irsyad, Sidenreng Rappang

Abd. Kahar Muzakkir, CV. Social Politic Genius (SIGn)

President Director, CV. Social Politic Genius (SIGn), Indonesia

References

Adji, O. S. (1984). Hukum (Acara) Pidana dalam Prospeksi. Jakarta: Erlangga.

Begem, S. S., Qamar, N., & Baharuddin, H. (2019). Sistem Hukum Penyelesaian Pelanggaran Hak Asasi Manusia (HAM) Berat Melalui Mahkamah Pidana Internasional. SIGn Jurnal Hukum, CV. Social Politic Genius (SIGn), 1(1), pp. 1-17. doi: https://doi.org/10.37276/sjh.v1i1.28

Circular of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number 7 of 1985 on Task Implementation Instructions of the Supervision and Observation Judge.

Decree of Minister of Justice of the Republic of Indonesia Number M.02-PK.04.10 of 1990 on Guidance Pattern Inmates/Prisoners.

Dewi, A. A. I. M. C. (2012). Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Korban Penyalahguna Narkotika dengan Berlakunya Undang-Undang Nomor 35 Tahun 2009 tentang Narkotika. Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal), Universitas Udayana, 1(1), pp. 77-88. doi: https://doi.org/10.24843/JMHU.2012.v01.i01.p01

Firmansyah, H. (2014). Peran Hakim Pengawas dan Pengamat sebagai Penilai Perilaku Narapidana di Lembaga Pemasyarakatan. Jurnal Hukum Prioris, Universitas Trisakti, 4(2), pp. 115-130.

Government Regulation of the Republic of Indonesia Number 32 of 1999 on Terms and Procedures for the Exercise of Correctional Assisted Residents Rights. (State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia of 1999 Number 69, Supplement to the State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Number 3846).

Government Regulation of the Republic of Indonesia Number 28 of 2006 on Amendment to Government Regulation Number 32 of 1999 on Terms and Procedures for the Exercise of Correctional Assisted Residents Rights. (State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia of 2006 Number 61, Supplement to the State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Number 4632).

Government Regulation of the Republic of Indonesia Number 99 of 2012 on the Second Amendment to Government Regulation Number 32 of 1999 on Terms and Procedures for the Exercise of Correctional Assisted Residents Rights. (State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia of 2012 Number 225, Supplement to the State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Number 5359).

Khotimah, K. & Astuti, P. (2018). Pelaksanaan Pengawasan Putusan Pengadilan di Gresik Jawa Timur. Novum: Jurnal Hukum, Universitas Negeri Surabaya, 5(4), pp. 1-9.

Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 8 of 1981 on the Code of Criminal Procedure. (State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia of 1981 Number 76, Supplement to the State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Number 3209).

Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 12 of 1995 on Correctional. (State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia of 1995 Number 77, Supplement to the State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Number 3614).

Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 48 of 2009 on the Judicial Powers. (State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia of 2009 Number 157, Supplement to the State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Number 5076).

Mahmud, Y., et al. (2019). Restorative Justice dalam Putusan Hakim Nomor: 31/Pid.Sus/2018/PN.Lbto Atas Kasus Persetubuhan terhadap Anak. SIGn Jurnal Hukum, CV. Social Politic Genius (SIGn), 1(1), pp. 52-69. doi: https://doi.org/10.37276/sjh.v1i1.37

Masu, R. R. & Aloysius, S. (2016). Model Pemberdayaan Hakim Pengawas dan Pengamat Berbasis Koordinasi dalam Mewujudkan Pengarusutamaan Hak Anak (PUHA) di Lapas Anak Kelas IIA Kupang Lembaga Pembinaan Khusus Anak Kupang (LPKA). Jurnal Paradigma Hukum Pembangunan, Universitas Katolik Atma Jaya, pp. 224-238.

Mys. (2011, May 11). Hapuskan Hakim Wasmat dari KUHAP. In Hukum Online. Retrieved from https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/baca/lt4dca6876d8a69/hapuskan-hakim-wasmat-dari-kuhap/, at the date on December 27, 2019.

Nasrullah, N. (2020). Putusan Hakim terhadap Pemberian Sanksi di Bawah Batas Minimal pada Tindak Pidana Narkotika. SIGn Jurnal Hukum, CV. Social Politic Genius (SIGn), 2(1), pp. 1-19. doi: https://doi.org/10.37276/sjh.v2i1.59

Pratama, W. A. (2019). Penegakan Hukuman Mati terhadap Pembunuhan Berencana. SIGn Jurnal Hukum, CV. Social Politic Genius (SIGn), 1(1), pp. 29-41. doi: https://doi.org/10.37276/sjh.v1i1.34

Purnomo, B. (1982). Pokok-Pokok Hukum Acara Pidana dan Beberapa Harapan dalam Pelaksanaan Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana. Yogyakarta: Liberty.

Qamar, N., et al. (2017). Metode Penelitian Hukum (Legal Research Methods). Makassar: CV. Social Politic Genius (SIGn).

Reksodiputro, M. (2007). Hak Asasi Manusia dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana. Jakarta: Pusat Pelayanan Keadilan dan Pengabdian Hukum, UI Press.

Sampara, S. & Husen, L. O. (2016). Metode Penelitian Hukum. Makassar: Kretakupa Print.

Soepiadhy, S. (2008). Meredesain Konstitusi: Pembangkangan Seorang Anak Bangsa Untuk Demokrasi. Jakarta: Burungmerak Press.

Suhariyanto, B. (2017). Kedudukan Perdamaian sebagai Penghapus Pemidanaan Guna Mewujudkan Keadilan dalam Pembaruan Hukum Pidana. Jurnal Rechts Vinding: Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional, Kementerian Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia RI, 6(1), pp. 1-19. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.33331/rechtsvinding.v6i1.127

Suherman, A. (2019). Implementasi Independensi Hakim dalam Pelaksanaan Kekuasaan Kehakiman. SIGn Jurnal Hukum, CV. Social Politic Genius (SIGn), 1(1), pp. 42-51.

Susansi, E. (2019). Fungsi Pengawasan Hakim Pengawas dan Pengamat terhadap Pembinaan Warga Binaan. Indonesian Journal of Criminal Law, Institute for Learning Innovation and Counseling, 1(2), pp. 77-88. doi: https://doi.org/10.31960/ijocl.v1i2.298

Syamsudin, M. (2011). Rekonstruksi Pola Pikir Hakim dalam Memutuskan Perkara Korupsi Berbasis Hukum Progresif. Dinamika Hukum, Universitas Jenderal Soedirman, 11(1)

Taufiq, A. I. (2016). Pelaksanaan Tugas Hakim Pengawas dan Pengamat Pengadilan Negeri Yogyakarta bagi Narapidana Penjara di Lapas Wirogunan dan Lapas Narkotika. Supremasi Hukum: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum, Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta, 5(2), pp. 143-167.

Tjahjati, E. (2012). Perlindungan dan Pembinaan terhadap Warga Binaan Pemasyarakatan (WBP) (Study di Lembaga Pemasyarakatan Anak Klas IIA Blitar). Mizan: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Universitas Islam Kadiri, 1(2), pp. 55-62.

Utoyo, M. (2015). Konsep Pembinaan Warga Binaan Pemasyarakatan Analysis of Prisoners Guidance to Reduce Level. Pranata Hukum, Universitas Bandar Lampung, 10(1), pp. 37-48.

Published
2020-06-09
How to Cite
Yafid, B. M., & Muzakkir, A. K. (2020). The Role of the Supervision and Observation Judge on Guidance for Inmates. Sovereign: International Journal of Law, 2(2), 40-56. https://doi.org/10.37276/sijl.v2i2.33